Independent robot evidence

Is this robot truly useful, reliable and safe?

Useworthy separates manufacturer claims from independent tests and real-world evidence — focusing on whether robots are reliable, autonomous, safe and genuinely useful to people.

Public alpha · no paid rankings · no certification claims
10Robot passports
Evidence sources indexed
Independent / field evidence entries
5Evidence confidence levels
Evidence explorer

See what is actually verified

Early-stage robots often have rich specifications but little long-term evidence. Useworthy makes that gap visible instead of filling it with a synthetic score.

Loading evidence index…
Useworthy principles

Evidence before rankings

01

Claims ≠ proof

A vendor datasheet is useful, but it is always labeled as a manufacturer claim. Public demos and field data get separate evidence classes.

02

Version everything

Hardware revision, firmware and test conditions matter. A safety or autonomy result is never treated as timeless.

03

Measure the burden

The long-term target is human interventions per 100 productive hours, unplanned downtime, autonomous recovery and true cost per productive hour.